Fraud in the Face of Disaster: How the False Claims Act Protects the Integrity of Government Disaster Aid
Fraudsters exploit government relief programs, siphoning critical resources away from the people and communities who need them most.
STATEMENT: TAF Coalition Statement on Zafirov Appeal
“The recent holding by a single district court judge was an outlier breaking with years of precedent and tradition of whistleblowing celebrated since this nation’s founding.”
Recent Developments in False Claims Act Constitutionality
The Eleventh Circuit has an opportunity to ensure that one of the main tools in the government’s fight against fraud is protected.
A Brief History of False Claims Act Constitutionality
The use of whistleblowers by the government to fight fraud in the United States dates all the way back to the 1600 Colonial Era.
STATEMENT: TAF Coalition Files Two Supreme Court Amicus Briefs to Protect Whistleblower Laws
“Powerful interests keep attacking the laws like the False Claims Act for a reason: They’re afraid of whistleblowers and accountability."
2024 Integrity in Government Award
The Anti-Fraud Coalition bestowed its Integrity in Government Award to Dan Fruchter, an official in the U.S. Attorney's Office in the Eastern District of Washington.
2024 Lawyers of the Year
The Anti-Fraud Coalition bestows the 2024 Lawyers of the Year Award to the Berger Montague & Reese Marketos teams for their efforts in the Janssen and PharMerica cases.
2024 Whistleblower of the Year
The Anti-Fraud Coalition bestowed its Whistleblower of the Year Award to Dr. Rayme Edler for her efforts to protect patients in Escambia County, Florida.
The Middle District of Florida Court Finds the Qui Tam Provision of the False Claims Act Unconstitutional because a Relator is an “Officer” of the United States
We are only recovering a fraction of the billions of dollars being lost to fraud. Whistleblowers are stepping up if the government has the resources to run with their cases.
STATEMENT: TAF Coalition Statement on Zafirov Holding
“This holding is an outlier, breaking with precedent, including the decisions of every appellate court that has considered this question."
